I remarked recently that I had attended a near lifeless traditional church. More recently, I attended a traditional service that was filled with life. What was the difference? It really came down to who got to play and who didn't.
Taking my cues from the Alt Worship network in the UK, new forms of worship do not equate to candles and coffee, videos and tables, stations and art. Rather, it is about access and inclusion. Who was invited and empowered to create and participate in worship? Was worship from the people or from the experts? Was the door open for any to come and share in the worship planning and execution? Did the worship itself invite a bodily encounter between a person and God, thus facilitating an engaged form of worship? Was there a deep sense that this is the people's worship and represents our collective offering to God? Was worship from us, the average Jane and Joe in the congregation, or was it from the priests performing rites for us, to us, but not with us?
These are the primary contributions of Emerging Church worship, but that is not to say that it hasn't existed in other movements and at other times. But I would say it is more explicit here than I have observed in other movements in the recent past.
I received joy and a deep sense of communal worship at that traditional service, as I witnessed young and old, men and women, representing various cultures and traditions, offering themselves up to God, in ways that made sense in their worlds. For me, it doesn't get much better than this...
I am in a church that has roots in the early Vineyard, and I know a "We all get to play", participatory ethos was an important emphasis. I know I've heard things like "God is the audience, we are the choir" and "Worship is not a spectator sport" more than once! I think it's an application of the priesthood of all believers, really, where there is no male or female, Jew or Greek, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all.
Posted by: Benjamin Sternke | March 14, 2006 at 11:50 AM
As a former "non denominational" Christian. (I remember when I actually believe that meant something to me and the others who pronounced it) I can honestly say that most of my judgements of more traditional churches were based mostly on ignorance and indifference.
Ignorance as to what they were doing, and indifference on their part to why I was there.
But after being tired a hearing good bands on Sundays and rick warren-ripoff preaching I was bored... extremely bored...
One Saturday night as I stood with eight other people around a table an Episcopal priest handed me a chalice and the "substance" that I had been searching for through "cool" and "innovative" worship found its way into my soul and I have never been the same.
God shows up when out\r hearts are open and hungry for God regardless of where we find ourselves.
nIce post.
Posted by: rick | March 14, 2006 at 06:17 PM
ooos... I rambled for so long that I failed to mention that in this Episcopal church the community participated in the liturgy... he took volunteers from the congregation to act out the Gosple reading for the evening. It was my fisrt and only time there and I was Jesus. Heck, it my non-denominational church it would have taken years of christian maturity to be Jesus, that or good hair.
Posted by: rick | March 14, 2006 at 06:22 PM
Ryan,
I like what you're saying here. I worked on staff at Lutheran church for half a year. Very interesting environment. I deffinately saw the need and desire (in some) to make our times of gathering created by the community, for the community.
To me, this more inclusive, less dichotomistic approach seems life breathing, to the "official leaders" as their roles seem less "official" and to the "lay members" as they get to do more than "lay" around.
And just curious...how long have you been teaching at Fuller? I have a friend starting there in the fall...heard good things.
Posted by: jim.k | March 16, 2006 at 07:14 AM
You've got to ask yourself, is God so vain that he requires our adolation?
Who wants to believe in a God that requires worship?
Posted by: Kieren Green | March 16, 2006 at 01:50 PM
Kieren,
That is a great question... I like to start with the fact that we all inherently worship SOMETHING - our kids, girlfriend, car, stuff - take your pick. Whenever we put someone or something in God's place, we tend to hold on a little too tightly, and we can end up making idols of things we should love, not worship. My Son was born with a hole in his heart, and it was only because there was One I loved more than my Son that I was able to hold it together as I faced his uncertain future. Worshiping God helped me to have the right perspective so that my Son was a huge part of my life, but not my whole life... He's about to turn 2 and doing well by the way.
So worshiping God puts everything in its right place.
I worship God for this reason, and because I am really grateful for my life and want to live it with God. I also tend to be a better person to be around when I follow Jesus' agenda instead of my own. This is a little simple, but when I've asked the same question of myself, that's what I've come up with.
Rich
Posted by: Rich | March 16, 2006 at 05:06 PM
I'm a 'new' pastor in my late 30s in a traditional denom (PC(USA)). I'm personally starting to explore things emerging mostly because I get the sense it will help me better integrate or navigate the liberal/conservative split I feel in my own theological convictions.
My question related to this particular post however is this:
I currently serve a small congregation (less than 100) in a mid-size city in central iowa.
How does one begin the process of looking at what makes sense worship wise to create a place for people "offering themselves up to God, in ways that made sense in their worlds?"
I often get the sense that this emerging stuff is most relevant in large, urban multi-ethnic youth oriented contexts.
I personally would like to explore engaging in some emerging practices, but think my congregation would revolt (an Ash Wednesday service we did for the first time was said to be too catholic for some of my cong!)
Just some thoughts, maybe some direction in terms of resources to explore....I supsect when it comes down to it part of my problem is that I'm in a different place than my congregation.
Posted by: Jim | March 20, 2006 at 08:38 AM
I see having just read your emerging concerns course post that the issue I raise above (emerging within tradition) is on the radar screen, there is just not a lot of activity or successful models yet on this issue.
Posted by: Jim | March 20, 2006 at 08:53 AM
Great thoughts. I just had a conversation last week about this. Inclusiveness is really what's missing in so much of our current church environments; platform celebrity has a tendency to downplay the "everyone counts" message in the Body of Christ.
Posted by: brian | March 20, 2006 at 09:17 PM
Thank you, Ryan!!! You have just succintly expressed precisely what we are trying to say in our little corner of MJewish life! We're actively working on starting that community I told you about a few months ago, and the meeting and planning is going very well for the early stages. But we've been trying to get at a few things when it came to "what needs to be present in worship," and you hit it. Some of us are also involved at a new monthly service that's sort of an area-wide thing, and these issues have already come up with a vengeance (and this Friday is only our second service!).
Would you (and Eddie, if he's bored with his non-retirement yet) ever be interested in having a workshop or something on the topic of "how to talk to people of liturgical difference without hostility"? I've been reading some Wink lately, and it's helping, but I'd love to get more nuts and bolts about it, if anybody else is interested in exploring the topic.
Posted by: britta k | March 21, 2006 at 01:04 AM
great conversations here --you'll find many resources at www.alternativeworship.com -- these communities have been engaging in highly participatory Eucharist services for a good 15 years...
Posted by: Ryan | March 22, 2006 at 03:32 PM
Hey Ryan
I can't find an email for you anywhere - could you please contact me? I am working on a docuemntary about the emrgent movement and I'd like to talk to you. Check this out for a lot of details:
http://www.endless-sky.com/dreams.html
Thanks! Your blog is awesome - I am a musician and ahve been shut out of a numebr of church bands over time because of egos and "who gets to play" and it never seems to fail -where the egos are, the thing seems to dry up...including peopel who attend in not only the actual performance of the worship music but inviting them to participate in what is happening is paramount to connection...
Posted by: Scott McLain | April 22, 2006 at 07:55 PM