Yesterday I posted the first part of a review on Ed Stetzer and David Putman's Breaking the Missional Code. I will briefly wrap up that review today. In yesterday's post, I celebrated the large amount of missiology that found its way into a book on church renewal and church planting. I had a couple of critiques yesterday as well -- the conflation of church marketing with cultural exegesis, and two, the whole church/unchurched typology.
Technorati Tags: book review, Ed Stetzer, missional church, David Putman
Today I wanted to comment on a couple more concerns. The authors discuss the emerging church within a three-part scheme: relevants, reconstructionists, and revisionists. They permit the first two and refuse the third. Besides disliking the term 'revisionist' (aren't they always the bad guys?), I think this rubric is problematic for the following reasons.
In the nineteenth century, Rufus Anderson and Henry Venn contributed a new idea to missiology -- that of the three-self formula. They advocated that a new church work or mission, if it is to become indigenous, must be self-supporting, self-propagating, and self-governing. My colleague, Charles Van Engen, mission theologian (and former President of the Reformed Church of America), advocates a fourth 'self' -- self-theologizing. Why his addition to the formula?
A new community must be self-theologizing or it will become nominal. Self-theologizing, how? To become an indigenous expression of faith, a community must form its life around scripture, engaging their culture within a praxis-reflection orientation. In other words, the community goes deep into the word in order to answer the questions of their culture. They 'practice' those answers in the world, and then reflect biblically again. Instead of self-theologizing, however, what frequently happens is that new faith communities are given a theology that answers nineteenth-century questions, or sixteenth-century questions, or fifth-century questions. These historical works will undoubtedly be helpful, but they will inevitably leave some questions unanswered. Each context presents its own issues. If the deep questions of a culture go unanswered, then Christians will seek answers elsewhere, without reference to scripture, thus inviting in nominality.
What Stetzman and Putman call revisionist I see as self-theologizing: reading scripture in light of a culture's questions. These emerging "self-theologians" copy the example of historical theologians engaging their particular culture) but they do not necessarily copy their responses.
A few more comments on the book. A strength and a weakness of the book are the standalone chapters. While it is great to read a chapter on leadership or networks, it would be helpful if the chapters were more integrated as a whole. In one chapter the missio Dei is touted as the missional response to the culture, rather than the Great Commission. However, the missio Dei is not mentioned again while a chapter is devoted to the Great Commission. In another part of the book, they write about various church models and contextualization theory, but the bulk of their examples are megachurches from highly Christianized parts of the country. I wanted to see a bit more exploration of the non-traditional and contextual churches they advocate in their model.
These critiques should not take away from a very solid, hugely informative book by Stetzer and Putman. They have served the church well with such a comprehensive endeavor.
"...In other words, the community goes deep into the word in order to answer the questions of their culture. They 'practice' those answers in the world, and then reflect biblically again."
Great stuff. I think the area where most of us revisionists fall short is in the "practicing" of those answers.
Posted by: Mark Van Steenwyk | April 27, 2007 at 12:06 PM
Blogs are good for every one where we get lots of information for any topics nice job keep it up!
Posted by: modern classic furniture | June 29, 2009 at 11:27 PM
The only thing that you need in this world to get through everything, is faith...
It's all about the faith, the family and your friends!!!!!!
Posted by: CR CONDOS | April 18, 2010 at 12:48 AM
if I had a doubt about narrow site could contact them to clarify? or more answer me through the blog?
Posted by: dental care | April 29, 2010 at 10:19 AM
One thorn of experience is worth a whole wilderness of warning. Practical wisdom is only to be learned in the school of experience. Do you think so?
Posted by: lacoste shirts | July 14, 2010 at 12:21 AM
Its great to see that people are sharing quite profitable information with each other and now we can move our selves to a new era.
Posted by: Dissertation help | July 19, 2010 at 09:49 PM
I posted the article because I felt a good discussion about it was called for. As you will note at the intro, I cut out several paragraphs that I felt were over the top and not substantiated, and some images that were not originals and could not be sourced.
Posted by: viagra online | October 11, 2010 at 11:07 AM
http://www.oakleyssunglasscheap.com
Hey I absolutely love this write-up and it was so nice so I am surely going to tweet it. I Have to say the Indepth research this article has is greatly extraordinary !!! Who goes that extra mile now days? Well Done !
Posted by: Replica oakley sunglasses | August 11, 2011 at 10:54 PM
Mother treat their child like a ralre treasure ,mother having cilldren are the most happiness person in the world
!
Posted by: cole haan shoes | September 06, 2011 at 06:44 PM
Tods is an Italian brand, shoes, covering appurtenances and added affairs articles articles and chaired by agent Diego Della Valle. Synonymous with acceptable above and Italian style, makes the Tod's products, the alluringly simple and affably practical. The cast craftsmen plan with the world's a lot of comfortable covering and anniversary section has the incomparable attending and feel can "truly handmade.
Posted by: tods online | September 20, 2011 at 10:58 PM
Thanks for your sharing! I think you are very reasonable, What people want to see is the thing, some days ago, I have seen an article is about your writing. I think also is very good: is about. I think is also a need to share with everyone. Hope to be helpful to you.
Posted by: fake oakley sunglasses | October 06, 2011 at 08:00 PM
great! i like this
Posted by: PAUL SMITH | October 12, 2011 at 01:40 AM
The same third grade students, in the composition of their future volunteer is said to be clowns. A Chinese teacher
denounced
As: "have no ambition, RuZi is not taught also!" With foreign teachers will say: "I hope you can bring laughter to
the world!"
(note: we, as the elder, not only easy to require more than encouraging, more narrow define the definition of
success.)
Posted by: north face outlet | November 11, 2011 at 11:33 PM
We pretty much appreciate your blog post. You can find a multitude of techniques we could put it to decent use with a minimum of effort on time and hard earned cash.
Posted by: replica belts | November 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM
thanks. it is really helpful to understand the difference and similarity between missional church and emerging church.
as i am a pastor in Japan, i think ideas of emerging churches fit better than, so called, church growth how-to-techniques.
http://www.cigarettesonlineforsale.net/
http://www.cheapcigarettesshop.com/
http://www.discountscigarette.com
Posted by: cigarettes online | November 28, 2011 at 06:40 PM
Imagine cruising down the interstate doing a good clip with not a care in the world. As you fly past a really nice looking Vette you suddenly realize that this is no ordinary Corvette; it is in fact a police car. Suddenly you stomach sickens as you realize that the Corvette has pulled in behind you, turned on its dash lights,
Posted by: the north face clearance | January 20, 2012 at 04:07 PM